|
It is an American assumption that science and
religion are mortal enemies from time immemorial, yet this assumed
emnity is of fairly recent derivation. In fact, the Catholic and
then Protestant churches fostered scientific thinking as a way to
better know God and were in many respects the cradle in which modern
science was nurtured to a point it could start to evolve independent
of its theological parent. Only when the findings of science became
difficult to reconcile with the predictions of older natural theological
hypotheses (e.g., plenitude and the Scala Naturae) did the friction
begin in earnest. Not coincidentally, this is when the word "science"
began to evolve from its original meaning of "knowledge in
general" to its specific modern use to describe knowledge about
the natural world. Like most family schisms, the breach became one
between science and its parent, in this case the Judeo-Christian
tradition, and little involved other religions. The emnity that
does exist has been fueled by aspects of religion, but no less by
the failure of scientists to accurately project what the basic principles
of science involve, and how this both gives science its power and
limits its scope.
|
 |
Born in Massachusetts, Dr. Tiffney
earned his bachelor's degree in Geology from Boston University and
his Ph.D. in Botany from Harvard University. He taught at Yale University
and was a curator in the Peabody Museum of Natural History before
moving to UCSB in 1986, where he joined the Department of Geological
Sciences. His research has focused on the evolution of land plants,
particularly in the last 65 million years, and particularly with emphasis
on their reproductive structures. Dr. Tiffney has won campus teaching
awards both at Yale University and UCSB for his style of presentation,
and for his emphasis on an interdisciplinary approach to knowledge. |